LabToolsThe Research Infrastructure
  • Features
  • Demo
  • Technology
  • Examples
  • White Paper
  • FiTrace
  • Data Analysis ↗
  • Calculators
  • Scheduler
Download
FeaturesDemoTechnologyExamplesWhite PaperFiTraceData Analysis ↗CalculatorsSchedulerHealth Tracker ↗

All examples · Example 5 of 34

Swarm PlotDistributionStatistical report

Swarm Plot: Calcium Transient Amplitude

Peak calcium transient amplitude (ΔF/F0) in individual WT and KO cells (n = 120 per genotype).

Peak calcium transient amplitude (ΔF/F0) in individual WT and KO cells (n = 120 per genotype).

Key findings

  • Amplitudes are right-skewed (skewness 1.05 and 1.47); Shapiro–Wilk rejects normality in 2 of 2 groups.
  • Mann–Whitney U = 3,818, p = 3.2 × 10⁻¹⁰, Cliff's δ = -0.47 — KO transients are larger.
  • Welch's t-test reaches the same conclusion (p = 7.2 × 10⁻¹⁰), so the result does not hinge on the choice of test.
23 LabTools stats calls
9 of 15 stats methods
LabTools 0.14.3
600 dpi PNG Data (CSV) Raw LabTools output
In this reportDescriptive statisticsNormalityEqual variancesOutlier screenConfidence intervals for the meanWT vs KO

Descriptive statistics

Location, spread and shape for every group — the first thing to read before choosing a test. Skewness near 0 and excess kurtosis near 0 are what a normal distribution looks like.

GroupnMeanSDSEMMedianQ1 – Q3Min – MaxSkewnessExcess kurtosis
WT1201.2880.54040.049331.1950.923 – 1.5970.43 – 3.0871.051.27
KO1201.910.90180.082321.7121.301 – 2.2170.517 – 5.631.472.85
LabTools call
stats.describe
labtools stats describe --groups @groups.json

The same method is available as an MCP tool (stats_describe) and from the desktop app's statistics panel.

Normality

Three tests of the same question — could these values come from a normal distribution? Shapiro–Wilk has the best power at bench sample sizes, Anderson–Darling is more sensitive in the tails, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov (Lilliefors-corrected) is included for comparability with older papers. A significant p means normality is rejected.

GroupnShapiro–Wilk WpAnderson–Darling A²pK–S DpVerdict
WT1200.93161.2 × 10⁻⁵2.1182.1 × 10⁻⁵0.1332.0 × 10⁻⁵Normality rejected
KO1200.89066.7 × 10⁻⁸3.3412.1 × 10⁻⁸0.12647.0 × 10⁻⁵Normality rejected
LabTools calls (3)
stats.normality
labtools stats normality --groups @groups.json --method shapiro-wilk
stats.normality
labtools stats normality --groups @groups.json --method anderson-darling
stats.normality
labtools stats normality --groups @groups.json --method kolmogorov-smirnov

The same method is available as an MCP tool (stats_normality) and from the desktop app's statistics panel.

LabTools notes

  • Group 'KO' rejects normality (p = 0.0000); prefer a rank-based test.
  • Group 'WT' rejects normality (p = 0.0000); prefer a rank-based test.
  • Group 'KO' rejects normality (p = 0.0001); prefer a rank-based test.

Equal variances

Student's t and one-way ANOVA assume every group has the same spread. LabTools' Levene test uses deviations from the group median (the Brown–Forsythe form), which stays reliable on skewed data; Bartlett's test is more powerful but only trustworthy when the data are normal. A significant p means the equal-variance assumption fails — prefer Welch's t-test or a rank-based test.

TestStatisticpLargest / smallest varianceVerdict
Levene (Brown–Forsythe, median-centred)14.120.00022.78Variances differ
Bartlett29.84.8 × 10⁻⁸2.78Variances differ
LabTools calls (2)
stats.levene
labtools stats levene --groups @groups.json --method levene
stats.levene
labtools stats levene --groups @groups.json --method bartlett

The same method is available as an MCP tool (stats_levene) and from the desktop app's statistics panel.

LabTools notes

  • Variances differ: use Welch's t-test (stats.ttest default) or stats.kruskal rather than the pooled-variance alternatives.
  • Bartlett's test assumes normality and is badly inflated when that fails — confirm with stats.normality, or use method='levene'.

Outlier screen

Five detectors with different assumptions. Grubbs tests the single most extreme point, generalised ESD looks for up to several (immune to masking), Dixon's Q is the small-sample chemistry test, modified-z uses the median and MAD so needs no normality, and the IQR rule is Tukey's boxplot fence. LabTools flags points; it never deletes them.

MethodWTKO
Grubbsnone1 (5.63)
Generalised ESDnone2 (5.63, 5.087)
Modified z (MAD)2 (3.087, 3.049)5 (4.034, 4.046, 5.63, 5.087 …)
IQR fences (1.5×)4 (2.658, 2.725, 3.087, 3.049)6 (4.034, 4.046, 5.63, 3.858 …)
LabTools calls (4)
stats.outliers
labtools stats outliers --groups @groups.json --method grubbs
stats.outliers
labtools stats outliers --groups @groups.json --method generalized-esd --max-outliers 5
stats.outliers
labtools stats outliers --groups @groups.json --method modified-z
stats.outliers
labtools stats outliers --groups @groups.json --method iqr

The same method is available as an MCP tool (stats_outliers) and from the desktop app's statistics panel.

LabTools notes

  • Flagged points are candidates, not verdicts, and nothing has been removed. Look for a physical cause before excluding anything; if there is none, keep the point and use a robust test instead. Any exclusion must be reported.
  • Grubbs tests only the single most extreme point, so a second outlier can mask the first. On larger samples use method='generalized_esd'.
  • The IQR rule is descriptive — it has no p-value and flags roughly 0.7% of a perfectly normal sample by construction.

Confidence intervals for the mean

t-based intervals: the range of population means these data are consistent with. Report them alongside p-values — an interval shows the size of an effect, a p-value does not.

GroupnMean95% CI
WT1201.288[1.19, 1.385]
KO1201.91[1.747, 2.073]
LabTools calls (2)
stats.ci
labtools stats ci --data @WT.json --conf-level 0.95
stats.ci
labtools stats ci --data @KO.json --conf-level 0.95

The same method is available as an MCP tool (stats_ci) and from the desktop app's statistics panel.

WT vs KO

The same comparison three ways. Welch's t-test (the LabTools default) does not assume equal variances; Student's pools them; Mann–Whitney compares ranks and needs no normality. When they agree the conclusion is robust to the choice.

TestStatisticdfpMean difference (WT − KO)95% CI of difference
Welch t-testt = -6.484194.77.2 × 10⁻¹⁰-0.6223[-0.8116, -0.4331]
Student t-testt = -6.4842385.1 × 10⁻¹⁰-0.6223[-0.8114, -0.4333]
Mann–Whitney UU = 3,818—3.2 × 10⁻¹⁰——
LabTools calls (3)
stats.ttest
labtools stats ttest --a @WT.json --b @KO.json --test welch
stats.ttest
labtools stats ttest --a @WT.json --b @KO.json --test student
stats.mannwhitney
labtools stats mannwhitney --a @WT.json --b @KO.json

The same method is available as an MCP tool (stats_ttest) and from the desktop app's statistics panel.

Effect sizes — how big, not just whether

MeasureEstimate95% CIMagnitude
Hedges' g (bias-corrected)-0.834[-1.097, -0.5706]large
Cohen's d-0.837—large
Glass's Δ (scaled by the WT SD)-1.15—large
Cliff's δ (non-parametric)-0.47—medium
LabTools calls (4)
stats.effectsize
labtools stats effectsize --a @WT.json --b @KO.json --measure hedges-g
stats.effectsize
labtools stats effectsize --a @WT.json --b @KO.json --measure cohens-d
stats.effectsize
labtools stats effectsize --a @KO.json --b @WT.json --measure glass-delta
stats.effectsize
labtools stats effectsize --a @WT.json --b @KO.json --measure cliffs-delta

The same method is available as an MCP tool (stats_effectsize) and from the desktop app's statistics panel.

LabTools notes

  • Group 'a' departs from normality (Shapiro–Wilk W = 0.9316, p = 0.0000 < 0.05). Consider stats.mannwhitney.
  • Group 'b' departs from normality (Shapiro–Wilk W = 0.8906, p = 0.0000 < 0.05). Consider stats.mannwhitney.

Design sensitivity

d = 0.363
Minimum detectable effect (80% power, α = 0.05)
n = 120 vs 120
97.1%
Power to detect d = 0.5
100.0%
Power to detect d = 0.8
100.0%
Power to detect d = 1.2
LabTools calls (2)
stats.power
labtools stats power --n1 120 --n2 120 --mode mde --power 0.8
stats.power
labtools stats power --n1 120 --n2 120 --effect-size 0.5

The same method is available as an MCP tool (stats_power) and from the desktop app's statistics panel.

Methods paragraph

Written to go straight into a manuscript.

Amplitudes were right-skewed, so genotypes were compared by a two-sided Mann–Whitney U test (U = 3,818, z = −6.29, p < 0.0001); Cliff’s δ = −0.47 (medium effect, KO larger).

Every number on this page was computed by the LabTools statistics engine (version 0.14.3) from the example's CSV on 2026-09-23. Where a value was derived before the data reached LabTools (replicate means, paired differences, log odds ratios), the text says so. The data are simulated from a fixed random seed.

Violin Plot: Cell ViabilityStrip Plot: qPCR ΔCt per Animal

Get started

Run the same analysis on your data

Every test on this page is built into LabTools — from the statistics panel, the command line, or an AI assistant through MCP.

Download freeMore examples

LabTools

The research infrastructure: plot to figure to manuscript in one place. Free for academic and individual use.

Product

  • Features
  • Technology
  • Demo & Tutorials
  • Examples
  • Download

Support

  • Contact Support
  • Help Center

Filliaux Industries

  • filliaux.com
  • Data Analysis
  • Health Tracker

Stay updated

Research tips, product updates, and release notes. No spam.

© 2026 Filliaux Industries · LabToolsPrivacyTermsCookiesLinkedIn